Logo: Earth First! Summer Gathering 2003, Yorkshire, Weds 13th - Sun 17th August
Skip navigation bar


Logo: Powered by Google


Arkangel's response to our statement on the Small Game Workshop

Re: Small Game Workshop

Thank you for your long and detailed response to my concerns regarding the inclusion of a Hunting small games workshop at the summer gathering. Sadly, as eloquently as you argue your point and address the need to give people the freedom of choice, it is not a choice that the animals at the end of a barrel or spear will have.

Accepting there's no easy fix in this moral maze is part of the dilemma that we face but does encouraging the perpetuation of barbaric practices really sit comfortably within the essence of the framework of Earth First! principles? Where does one draw the line with freedom of choice? It seems like a moral minority can have carte blanche because nonhuman life is at stake yet there would be no dispute if the dispute were over a comparable human issue!

You could, for example argue that the similarities between Earth First! principles and those of right wing US Survivalist groups outweigh the dissimilarities and that barring their fascist tendencies they are allies. You and I both know that nothing could be further from the truth. There's that freedom of choice thing again... where does it begin and end?

As much as we would all like to believe that the anarcho-primitivist members of Earth First! have an argument, that argument remains species-centred and could be called Humans First!

You mention the question of introduced species and that it could be argued that their removal is better for the Earth. The hunting of animals for food to rebalance ecosystems is an absolute nonsense when we should be addressing the far more crucial issue of why these imbalances have come about in the first place, and the answer must always be: through human intervention.

Who is to be the arbitrator as to what must live and what must die? Once again,we are making a species-centred value judgement based on our assessment of wrongs and rights which deny individual life forms their right to life.

As tragic as the introduction of alien species may be, the threat to existing ecosystems has long resided in the form of human intervention, and most if not all the ecosystems we see, at least in this country, have developed as a direct result of human intervention.

If we look at it from a purely historical perspective, the majority of these islands were originally forested. The moment humans intervened by cutting down the forests, the original ecosysytems were destroyed. This is the nature of a world at the mercy of our activities - nature adapts, and constantly redefines itself; what has been lost is lost forever, and no manner of anarcho-primitivist hunting will restore what has gone.

We should instead - all of us - be uniting to stop the further destruction, and not use environmental principles to satisfy meat eating habits with some spurious argument about doing it for the earth! Lets call a spade a spade and not clothe it with some moral argument!

Earth firsters lean towards the view that what is right for the earth is right for us; that must certainly be true, but if the predominant view is that veganism is the way forward, regardless of whether individuals have animal rights sympathies or not, then surely the workshops should reflect that predominant view and educate those opposed to it as to the other basic truth: that hunting animals for food is how we started out - it is what gave us the basis for the society we have now - that exploitation of the weak and vulnerable is acceptable - ie: "fair game".

The life of an animal isn't defined by the game or sport it can provide for humans - it is defined on its own terms. Its life is worth everything to it - until some human decides its better it should be dead! Implicit in the very language used to list the proposed workshop (ie: game) defines the archaic and unchanging attitudes we have towards the entire animate world. Why go back to square one? We know how that ended and it will only come back full circle.

There must be another way, and thats the way any radical voice should be advocating, surely?

Best Wishes

Robert Cogswell

Danuta Mayer (Assistant Editor)